QR Displays vs Printed Menus: Cost, Hygiene & UX in 2025

QR Displays vs Printed Menus: Cost, Hygiene & UX in 2025

Since 2020, QR menu displays became a standard solution for cafés and restaurants, solving hygiene concerns and enabling contactless ordering. By 2025, the focus has shifted: are QR menus still superior, or do guests prefer the tactile experience of printed menus? This guide compares QR vs printed menus across cost, hygiene, branding, and guest experience to help you choose the right format for your concept.

(New to menu strategy? Start with our Pillar Guide: Restaurant Menu Presentation & Tabletop Branding.)

Hygiene & Safety: Why QR Still Matters

Hygiene drove the QR menu boom in 2020–2021.

  • QR Displays: contactless, instant updates, no cleaning required
  • Printed Menus: require regular sanitation, but modern solutions like acrylic, PVC, or PU covers simplify cleaning

Pro tip: For high-traffic cafés, bars, or terraces, QR is efficient. Premium dining still favors printed menus if maintained properly.

QR display menu in café setting

Cost Comparison: The Hidden Numbers

QR Menus

Pros Cons
Low upfront cost Need stable Wi-Fi
Instant updates Need mobile-optimized app/site
No printing fees Ongoing digital maintenance

Hidden costs: guest frustration if connectivity fails, platform subscriptions, potential reduction in upsells

Printed Menus

Pros Cons
Strong ROI when paired with durable wood, PU, or leather covers Higher initial investment

Seasonal reprints required

Hidden costs: outdated menus if reprints are delayed, storage for multiple versions

💡 Hybrid approach: Use QR for daily specials and printed menus for signature dishes.

Guest Experience & UX: The Power of Touch

Guests don’t just read menus — they feel them.

  • Printed Menus: tactile, premium, sensory; materials like wood, leather, or fabric reinforce brand identity
  • QR Menus: efficient but impersonal; some guests dislike scrolling on phones while dining

Studies show diners spend more time with physical menus and often order more when design supports menu engineering.

luxury printed menu with leather cover

Branding & Upselling Potential

  • Printed menus allow engraving, foil stamping, UV printing, and texture — perfect for premium branding
  • QR menus are limited to digital templates and lack the tactile premium perception

Upselling is stronger on printed formats: strategic visual hierarchy and textures guide guests toward high-margin items.

When to Choose Each Format

Best for QR Displays:

  • High-traffic cafés, quick-service restaurants
  • Outdoor terraces
  • Hygiene-critical settings

Best for Printed Menus:

  • Fine dining, wine bars, cocktail lounges
  • Premium concepts emphasizing brand and tactile experience
  • Concepts where upselling is important

QR Displays vs Printed Menus: Quick Comparison

Factor QR Displays Printed Menus
Hygiene "Contactless, no cleaning" "Requires cleaning; modern covers make sanitation easy"
Cost "Low upfront, ongoing maintenance" "Higher upfront (covers, printing), long-term ROI"
UX & Engagement "Fast, impersonal" "Tactile, premium, supports upselling"
Branding Limited templates "Full customization: engraving, foil, UV, texture"
Durability Relies on Wi-Fi & devices "Long-lasting with wood, leather, PU, PVC"
Best For "High-traffic cafés, terraces, QSR" "Fine dining, wine bars, premium concepts"

Conclusion

In 2025, it’s not about QR vs printed — it’s about balance.

  • Use QR menus for speed, hygiene, and cost efficiency
  • Use printed menus for premium branding, tactile experience, and upselling potential

    👉 Explore our Menu Covers Collection — wood, leather, and acrylic — to craft a dining experience that aligns with your restaurant concept.

    comparing QR menus and printed menus in café

Reading next

Menu Engineering Meets Presentation: How the Cover, Stand & Layout Influence Sales
Check Presenters & Bill Folders: Small Details That Elevate the Final Impression

Leave a comment

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.